The full anatomy of a phishing site,
one URL at a time.
ZeroPhish renders the page, runs twelve detection signals against the DOM, certificate chain, brand fingerprint and threat feeds, and returns a typed verdict. Built for security teams and product engineers.
No phishing signals detected
| URL | hxxps://resgatarvivasorte[.]com/ | |
| Host | resgatarvivasorte[.]com | |
| Brand | Viva Sorte+ | |
| Screenshot | https://cdn.zerophish.ai/f9326a63-28ef-4e6d-87b6-9b1706191610.jpg | |
| Scan ID | 10d265d3-0ca8-4724-9a5f-aaabef0b470d |
| Host | resgatarvivasorte.com |
| Registered domain | resgatarvivasorte.com |
| Scheme | https |
| Content length | 54024 B |
| HTTP | 200 · text/html |
| JARM | 0d39b39b30d30d30320320320320127c6ef00d2ce6e8ccd6c7d8fc7b092b31 |
| Redirect hops | 1 |
Verdict: likely legitimate (not enough phishing indicators)
The page presents itself as “Viva Sorte+ — Login” and says “Identifique-se usando seu CPF”. It shows a single input/CTA flow labeled CPF → “Continuar”, plus footer disclosures about a capitalização product issued by “VIA CAPITALIZAÇÃO S/A.” and mentions Susep and the beneficiary institute.
Suspicious elements checked
- Credential/PII collection form present: The form explicitly requests CPF (label “CPF” and the “loginForm” container). This is sensitive personal data collection, but there is no password field in the provided HTML.
- Security/Google warning text: The page includes “Este site é protegido pelo Google reCAPTCHA…”. This is commonly present on legitimate sites and, by itself, is not proof of phishing.
- Brand/URL relationship: The URL is resgatarvivasorte.com and the branding is Viva Sorte+. The domain appears to be aligned with the brand name (no clear mismatch like PayPal on a random domain). No evidence of an unrelated major brand impersonation is shown.
- No visible urgency/scare tactics: The HTML/OCR do not contain classic phishing prompts like “account suspended”, “unauthorized login”, “final notice”, or “immediate payment required”.
- No suspicious redirect patterns shown: The provided HTML is static and does not show links like “verify now” to third-party domains or obfuscated redirect URLs.
Why phishing is marked low
While it does collect CPF, the surrounding content contains substantial, specific regulatory/product disclosures consistent with a legitimate service page, and the branding matches the domain context. With the evidence provided, there are no strong phishing hallmarks (credential harvesting for passwords, fake security lockouts, mismatched brand/URL, or urgent account threats).
Confidence
Evidence suggests legitimacy, but because the page does collect CPF and the HTML is simplified, a definitive determination would require checking the backend form action/requests and domain registration history. Hence, phishing risk is low-to-moderate rather than zero.